Friday 6 May 2016

(ASSIGNMENT 3) CORRUPTION AND DEVELOPMENT – SREEDHAR VINAYAK

1.     “It is hard for historians now, looking back at the middle ages, to distinguish the bribe, which was in theory illicit and morally tainted, from the gift, which was allegedly licit and morally virtuous, in a world in which the exchange of oaths, of tokens of wealth and of tokens of power was ubiquitous” (Jordan 2009, 205).
2.     “In the late twelfth and early thirteenth century, sharper distinctions arose between licit and illicit giving and receiving, loyalties were strictly circumscribed and punishments dictated for breaching the rules.” (Jordan 2009, 207).
3.     The main features of these anti-corruption campaigns in Europe included “increase in pecuniary benefits and endowments (as long as the officials remained honest), recruitment of people who had sworn vows of absolute poverty (like Dominicans) as well as those whom the king knew personally, and intensive scrutiny along with full governmental audits” (Jordan 2009, 210).
4.     “What happened in the thirteenth century was not a fluke, but part of a broad ranging political and social formation whose legacy, the notion that the state has a powerful interest in transparency of transactions, is still with us” (Jordan 2009, 214).
5.     A major reason for such a widespread campaign in 13th century was the impulse for the “moral regeneration or the restoration of moral equilibrium in Europe”, immediately after the crusade (Jordan 2009, 217).
6.     There are two major caveats in the seemingly triumphalist picture of anti-corruption campaign – First being the fact that “too much control on corruption actually impedes the efficient operation of an administrative system” and secondly, “most of the so-called tempters were the disenfranchised groups, who had a self-perceived moral right – due to the unjustness of the laws they were subjected to – to induce a breach of trust in a royal agent” (Jordan 2009, 218).
7.     “Bribery was a form of resistance. The success of the anti-corruption campaign in thirteenth century was therefore a hammer-blow to disadvantaged groups for which the ease of bribing or of hiding bribes behind the congenial language of gift and service had been, hitherto, something like a God-send, a true bestowal of Heaven’s grace” (Jordan 2009, 219).
8.     Own Sentence: Jordan’s article problematizes the very notion of state intervention on corruption and questions the extent to which such campaigns can be effective, without leading to inefficient or unjust administration.

Bibliography

Jordan, William Chester. "Anti-corruption campaigns in thirteenth-century Europe." Journal of Medieval History (Elsevier) 35 (2009): 204-219.


No comments:

Post a Comment