Saturday 7 May 2016

(ASSIGNMENT 4) REVISITING CORRPTION IN SOUTH KOREA - Jueeli More

In Michael Johnston's 'Syndromes of Corruption', he labelled corruption in South Korea as that of 'Elite Cartels', however if one were to go beyond this label and try to characterise corruption in South Korea it would reveal a more entrenched and pervasive process that the citizens identify, and endorse in. One could say that corruption in South Korea is almost a way of life and therefore combatting corruption in a state such as this is especially difficult as, there exists a history of close interactions between the public and the private sectors and the dominance of the elite classes is clearly identifiable in almost every sphere.

Since Korean culture consists heavily of influences from Confucian philosophy and the state is characterised by authoritarian bureaucracy, there exist very close ties between one's personal life and the public one.
Therefore it becomes very difficult for one to distinguish between the roles that one has to play when in power and work effectively free from any influence arising from personal ties. Another important factor to take into consideration is that pervasive corruption is found at almost all levels of the government. For those at the bottom of the hierarchy,  bribery becomes a lucrative incentive to increase personal gain as their incomes are quite low. The bigger problem still remains at the higher levels of the society and government where those with enough power and wealth extend it to influence the government. Private business enjoy a great amount of leeway as they often engage in malpractices such as collusion to appropriate bigger profits without the fear of being penalised from the authority.

In a state where the incidence of corruption is specially high, it takes a strong political will in order to make any anti-corruption agency function effectively, however this remains a critical problem in South Korea where numerous such attempts have failed simply because those found guilty of corruption are not punished as severely as one would expect them to be – especially because those in the public sector often have something to gain from the outcomes of the corrupt practices. Another problem is the extremely low levels of trust of the citizens in their government and weak protection measures to whistleblowers which makes it difficult for citizens to report incidences of corrupt practices.

Therefore, any measures to combat corruption in South Korea need to begin with solving the problem of social hierarchy in the society. The only way this can be done is to strengthen the institutions and revise the laws which, in themselves are quite lax and can be taken advantage of by those in power. A second measure that needs to be adopted is stronger protection laws for whistleblowers in order to give citizens more power to report incidences of corruption while feeling secured from the those in power. A third measure that could result in an effective mechanism to combat corrupt practices by the larger business firms is to provide financial support to medium and small enterprises in order for them to grow and diversify their business which would result in an equitable distribution of power over between large and small business firms – and eventually decrease the power of the larger business firms in the economic and political sectors.

References:

Quah . T. S Jon, “Combatting corruption in South Asian countries: what have we learnt?” (https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjGn8Tt07vMAhXVA44KHe_QDO8QFggsMAM&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjournal.hkpaa.org.hk%2Findex.php%2Fpaap-journal%2Fspring-2013%2Fdoc_download%2F50-combating-corruption-in-asian-countries-what-lessons-have-we-learnt&usg=AFQjCNE3-mpX8-uEdwbB5aD6nMzbSyeoZg&sig2=YIYLo0NWUbQl1oYAk1lXkw&bvm=bv.121070826,d.c2E

No comments:

Post a Comment